10:11 PM
The Jumping Controversy
THE notification dated September 13. 2013 was framed because the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE)
had changed the syllabus, pattern of examination Therefore it was imperative for the University to abide by the same. Time in order facilitate and help the repeater students, the notification laid down a specific scheme. On the strength of this notification these students were permitted to step into higher class, despite the fact they were not eligible to enter into the high er class I his facility was gram ed because of the transition from the old course to the new course. Further the old course was to be discontinued in a two Academic years.
These students upon getting admission to the 11 igher Semester. also cleared (heir backlog in Winter 2013 examination. The students mostly belonging to third, fourth, filth, sixth semester were the beneficiary of this notification.
These students upon clearing their backlog started demanding (hat they be permitted 10 appear in die Summer 2014 examina lion because they are proseculing regular studies or they be provided with increased "carry on jumping" or an increased ATKT facility in order to regularise there admissions 10 the Higher class.
Il is in these circumstances, the University Administration was forced 10 frame the new jumping notification published by the University on March 11. 2014 and an amendment relaxing the norms was subsequently stayed by the Chancellor. The High Court also refused to gram any respite to students and Chancellor and newly appointed acting V-C also refused lo dilute eligibility norms
had changed the syllabus, pattern of examination Therefore it was imperative for the University to abide by the same. Time in order facilitate and help the repeater students, the notification laid down a specific scheme. On the strength of this notification these students were permitted to step into higher class, despite the fact they were not eligible to enter into the high er class I his facility was gram ed because of the transition from the old course to the new course. Further the old course was to be discontinued in a two Academic years.
These students upon getting admission to the 11 igher Semester. also cleared (heir backlog in Winter 2013 examination. The students mostly belonging to third, fourth, filth, sixth semester were the beneficiary of this notification.
These students upon clearing their backlog started demanding (hat they be permitted 10 appear in die Summer 2014 examina lion because they are proseculing regular studies or they be provided with increased "carry on jumping" or an increased ATKT facility in order to regularise there admissions 10 the Higher class.
Il is in these circumstances, the University Administration was forced 10 frame the new jumping notification published by the University on March 11. 2014 and an amendment relaxing the norms was subsequently stayed by the Chancellor. The High Court also refused to gram any respite to students and Chancellor and newly appointed acting V-C also refused lo dilute eligibility norms
Posted in: News 2014
0 comments:
Post a Comment